Next month I will be attending the Rebel Wisdom Summit in Brick Lane, London, with two members of my family.
On the front page of the Rebel Wisdom website is the statement:
When our existing ways of thinking break down, it’s the rebels and the renegades, those who dare to think differently, who need to reboot the system.
I don’t consider myself to be a rebel or a renegade, but I am interested in people who think differently and the four speakers for the event all seem to fit this category.
I first came across Rebel Wisdom last November on Twitter, where I found that they were live streaming an interview with Iain McGilchrist, which I then attended. Aside from hearing McGilchrist speak, which is always enlightening, the main thing that struck me about that event was that it was male dominated, both in the chat that I participated in by posting a question, and also in the room where the live event was taking place. In addition, in the online chat, many of the men seemed to be fixated on Jordan Peterson, even though it was Iain McGilchrist who was being interviewed. Given that Rebel Wisdom puts a heavy focus on what they refer to as ‘New Masculinity’ perhaps it is not surprising that the event was male dominated, although Rebel Wisdom also seems about to offer a ‘New Woman’ retreat. This might redress the balance, but a course/retreat for just women wouldn’t appeal to me.
So it will be interesting to see whether there are more men than women at the Summit next month.
The build-up to this summit has been interesting. On buying the tickets we each had to sign an agreement. The organisers explained this with these words: “In order to create a safe environment in which we can discuss challenging topics, we ask that all attendees read and ‘sign’ the agreement below by checking the box.”
I understand that the Rebel Wisdom Summit is designed to be a safe environment for discussing challenging topics, one in which all attendees commit to leaving preconceived ideas and ideologies at the door.
I agree to take responsibility for my own responses and how I communicate. I am willing to have my ideas challenged. I understand that at times I may feel discomfort, and am willing to take responsibility for this as well. I am willing to practice self-inquiry and do my best to listen carefully to others.
I agree to engage in discussions in good faith, without a specific agenda, and with respect. I recognise that others are entitled to their views, and agree to consider and critique their ideas, rather than them as an individual.
I am also willing to have fun, to be rebellious in my thinking, and to be a part of an exciting new form of cultural conversation.
This makes more sense to me now that I have watched the videos that have been sent to us this week to help us prepare for this event (see references below), a couple of which focus on what is described as “Having a Real Conversation”. I do wonder, though, whether they are expecting the discussions at the summit to be heated, and if so, what the topics for discussion will be. Interestingly we have been asked not to tweet or share content of what the speakers say, which is intended to ensure them a safe space in which to share their ‘Thinking in Public’. We can, though, share information from the group discussions, so long as contributing participants’ anonymity is maintained.
I already appreciate the advance organisers we have received from the Rebel Wisdom team, which from an educator’s perspective is a definite sign of good practice. I also appreciate the efforts being made to ensure that everyone can have their voice heard if they so wish. Asking participants to take responsibility for this is also a sign of good educational practice. I have not volunteered to moderate/chair group discussions, but it would be interesting to know what advice the moderators will be given on how to handle, for example, a dysfunctional group. Maybe I’ll find out on the day.
Having watched the videos and read the article (and there is still time to do more research before the event), and booked our train tickets and hotel, I am really looking forward to this event, which will even throw in a party in the evening, and I’m looking forward to meeting some of the other participants. The number for the event has been capped at 150 (Dunbar’s number!) and there is a long waiting list, so I feel we are lucky to have our places. I don’t see how it can fail to be interesting.
References from https://youtu.be/tyABweDYPe8
- Jordan Greenhall – Situational Assessment 2017 (viral article)
- RSA animation of Iain McGilchrist’s ‘Master and his Emissary’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvr_g…
- Vice film on Heather & Bret’s experience at Evergreen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cMYf…
Rebel Wisdom films.
- Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying, “Gender Ideology vs Biology”: https://youtu.be/7xU77FhkcZ8
- Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying, “Having a Real Conversation”: https://youtu.be/ZBkF-xJh6tU
- Iain McGilchrist, “Certainty and Flow”: https://youtu.be/fI1ngqwH5us
- Jordan Greenhall, “The Paradox of the Times”: https://youtu.be/_SmGMJzWHK4
- Jordan Greenhall, “Genuine Conversation and the Intellectual Dark Web”: https://youtu.be/tQGksc1I7rA