I will start by saying that I do not draw to think, even though I do occasionally draw. I write to think, which is why I am writing this post. Let me explain.
Next week I will attend a one day symposium at Lancaster University on ‘The Materiality of Nothing’
The purpose of the symposium is ‘to extend conversations initiated by the AHRC funded ‘Dark Matters’ project which considered the provocations around Thresholds of Imperceptibility’ I attended the Dark Matters workshop at the end of last year and wrote a couple of posts about it.
- Dark Matters: Exploring Thresholds of (Im)perceptibility
- Interrogating Thresholds of (Im)perceptibility
For the symposium next week, the invitation from Sarah Casey included the following text:
The Materiality of Nothing is a one day symposium at Lancaster University bringing together practice and perspectives on negotiating the absent, unseen and unknown across art, science and social science. Across the arts and sciences that we call ‘zero’, ‘absence’ or ‘nothing’ remains a potent and powerful entity shaping the way we make sense of the world. It is staggering to reflect that 95% of our universe is invisible to human sensing; the provocation of the unknown and unseen is arguably at the core of creative thinking in the arts and sciences.
This event brings together a range perspectives on materialising the absent, unseen and unknown to reflect on the following questions:
- How can ‘nothing’ be embodied?
- How does it feel to encounter the immaterial and how might we negotiate it?
- How might mathematics – as a speculative ‘messenger’ to and from the unsensed – be understood as a medium for generating touch and relationship (or not)?
- How might absence, uncertainty be used as provocations and tool for creative thinking?
- What can this offer in terms of understanding relationship and non-relationship, affect and non affect?
For me this resonates with my interest in Absent Presence and also in what Peter Shukie has called the ‘voice of the voiceless’. In other words, how can we give voice to the voiceless and how we can become more aware of the influences of what is not in plain sight?
A final paragraph in Sarah’s invitation asks us to ….
…. bring along a drawing , notebook or object that could be described as something you think with. The principal editor of Drawing Research Theory Practice Journal published by Intellect has been in touch and is keen to link up this aspect of the symposium with the journal.
Hence the title of this post.
This invitation has highlighted for me that I do not draw to think, although I am interested enough in drawing to know that many people use drawing to think. Here are a few people that come to mind.
Marc Chagall’s sketchbook
Peter Checkland’s soft systems methodology rich pictures
Nick Sousanis – sketching entropy
From the Research Theory Practice Journal website it is clear that the journal is interested in physical drawing as opposed to electronic drawing.
This journal seeks to reestablish the materiality of drawing as a medium at a time when virtual, on-line, and electronic media dominates visuality and communication.
This is interesting when artists such as David Hockney are using iPads for drawing. Hockney is on my mind at the moment as I will be going to see his portraits exhibition at the Royal Academy in London in September.
So knowing that I write to think, rather than draw to think, and knowing that the activity for the symposium next week really wants physical drawings rather than ’electronic’ drawings, I am a bit stumped. But I can only do what I can do, so I am taking along the following two examples of drawing/mapping that I do electronically.
This example above is how I think about and reflect on any given learning experience. I use the Footprints of Emergence framework which Roy Williams, Simone Gumtau and I developed for trying to understand learning in open learning environments. This has been published as a research paper. The ‘footprints’ above reflect my experience in the Modern and Contemporary American Poetry MOOC and were included in a book chapter that we published in 2015.
Williams, R., Mackness, J., & Pauschenwein, J. (2015). Using Visualization to Understand Transformations in Learning and Design in MOOCs. In A. Mesquita & P. Peres (Eds.), Furthering Higher Education Possibilities through Massive Open Online Courses (pp. 193 – 209). IGI Global book series Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8279-5
The second example is a mapping exercise
For this I used a mapping tool developed by Matthias Melcher to trace the development of my thinking through my research papers. I blogged about it at the time.
I suspect that neither of these is considered examples of drawing to think, but they’re as close as I can get.
I am very much looking forward to the symposium next Thursday.