This was the title of a talk given by Dean Shareski to ETMOOC last week. Dean is always entertaining to listen to and for me there is no doubting his sincerity and passion for his belief in sharing as accountability.
But Dean and I don’t really see eye to eye about sharing as accountability, as testified by the discussion generated by this blog post more than a year ago.
From his talk to ETMOOC, I don’t think either of us have shifted our positions that much, although in this talk he did not explicitly mention sharing as a moral imperative and he did ask participants what the dangers of sharing might be.
However, at one point, he still said ‘You should feel guilty if you are not sharing anything’. Is there a hint of taking the moral high ground there? To be fair I think these comments are usually made (but not always) in the context of teaching. As David Wiley has evidently said, it is pretty impossible to teach without sharing.
But do we have a common understanding of what we mean by sharing?
- sharing as a reciprocal relationship involving mutuality and interdependence?
- sharing of thoughts and feelings in social communication?
- sharing as altruistic giving and distribution?
Interesting is a summary of Peter Corning’s book ‘Nature’s Magic: Synergy In Evolution And the Fate of Humankind’, where Corning writes:
Work by Gintis, Bowes, Fehr and Gächter indicate that strong reciprocity among humans is egoistic, not altruistic or cooperative, and depends on aggressive punishment of cheaters.
So maybe sharing is not all it is cracked up to be?
I should stress that I am not anti-sharing. More that I think it important to take an informed and balanced approach to the practice of sharing, such as found in the discussions around cooperation and collaboration, for example by
- Harold Jarche in his blog post – In networks cooperation trumps collaboration
- Stephen Downes in his blog Collaboration and Cooperation
All this is on my mind because of the work I am doing on Howard Rheingold’s Towards a Literacy of Cooperation course and my thinking about how sharing, cooperation and collaboration inform each other. I will be surprised if I come out this course without having undergone a shift in my understanding, so maybe the next time I see/listen to Dean talk it will be through a different lens.